Property editor fully featured?

[wysota]

My understanding is that Qt is trying to treat all things equal (thus no layout managers ... a design decision)

I don't quite understand... You can operate on layouts in Designer, can't you?

... yet have Qt Designer provide a natural view to the designer.

It does provide a way. Even two ways. One is placing widgets on the form first and then applying a layout. The other is to modify an existing layout by dragging objects which are part of it.

It's the abstraction I'm trying to work from. The notion of where a widget lives (logically ... i.e. a quadrant) in a QGridLayout is important and necessary to specify by the designer. Albeit, I freely admit I'm confused about how to specify it (and particular so change it) graphically in some cases.

Place widgets first, layouts later.

I agree it could need some more features, especially being able to change the hierarchy in the object inspector via drag'n'drop

This is something I'd like to see too, but I believe it is very hard to implement it. If you modify the hierarchy, the coordinates of widgets change, the layouts change, it would be hard to place those "pulled out" widgets in appropriate coordinates in their new parent to avoid a mess on the form.

emptying containers

Hmm.. have you tried selecting the contents of a container and pressing "Delete"? Or breaking container's layout and dragging widgets outside of the container?

and "flattening" them.

I don't know what you mean by "flattening" a container.

Some more widgets to chose from would be great

I'm sorry, who forbids you from adding more widgets to Designer?

too since it does take quite some effort to get acquainted enough with it to be able to add custom widgets

Are you serious with that? With Qt4 it is really easy - you open a context menu and choose "promote widget" and that's it, the easiest way to add custom widgets.

or even the ones native to Qt which are not available in the designer.

Which ones are you talking about? They are not there to choose from because of a reason. And if you insist, you can always make a plugin that makes it possible to place them directly on form. For Qt3 you can use wwWidgets to place some of them on the form, but believe me, you won't be able to do anything serious with them without subclassing anyway...

[ZB]

I'm sorry, who forbids you from adding more widgets to Designer?
...

I think you are misunderstanding me, or not fully reading my post.

Emptying containers automatically, flattening widgets (not the widgets, their hierarchy) and having more native widgets to chose from is what the Qt Designer in itself is all about - adding comfort, and there is no wrong in saying it would be nice and comfortable to have without going through the effort (which I insist is alot for non-expert users) of extending the Qt Designer on your own.

If I said a glass of orange juice would be nice too, would you ask me sorry, but who forbids you to grow an orange tree and squeezing your own juice? I am simply saying it would be comfortable.

Thanks

[wysota]

I think you are misunderstanding me, or not fully reading my post.

So enlighten me

Emptying containers automatically,

What do you mean by "automatically"? Electric impulses start to circulate through your brain and the container contents get deleted? You have to push something, it doesn't matter if it is the delete key on your keyboard or some other special combination.

flattening widgets (not the widgets, their hierarchy)

I still don't understand what you mean by flattening widgets or their hierarchy... you mean to recursively reparent all widgets from a container to the form itself? Read my previous reply again, it would create a mess on the form, especially with more complex containers.

and having more native widgets to chose from

Again, what native widgets? Name three...

is what the Qt Designer in itself is all about - adding comfort, and there is no wrong in saying it would be nice and comfortable to have without going through the effort (which I insist is alot for non-expert users) of extending the Qt Designer on your own.

But who asks you to extend Designer? Most of the features you desire are already there, you just didn't discover them yet.

If I said a glass of orange juice would be nice too, would you ask me sorry, but who forbids you to grow an orange tree and squeezing your own juice? I am simply saying it would be comfortable.

No, I would say Designer is not meant to serve orange juice but to design widgets. Just like people start comparing Designer to some IDEs. Designer is not an IDE and is not meant to be one. And even if Designer was serving fuit juice, you'd be lost in the vast number of fruits to choose from while trying to get a simple thing done.

Besides, I doubt many people would appreciate serving fruit juice by a GUI designer. If you want/need a feature that is missing, you either have to implement it yourself or live without it by achieving the same effect in some other manner.

To be honest, I can't think of a reason to "flatten" hierarchy of a container, you'd still have to drag all the widgets around manually trying to place them on the form and creating a big mess. I don't see how having a button to create chaos on the form is superior to dragging the hierarchy of widgets out of the container using a single mouse movement. And what happens if you want to sustain the lowest hierarchy in a container? "Flattening" the container would force you to find and reinsert all the "lowest level" widgets to respective containers. With the current implementation that won't be a problem, because those low-level widgets would still reside inside their containers.

Too much possibilities to choose from create chaos. It is better to do one thing good then to do everything lousy. Next step you'll be asking for a button labeled "Implement my program for me".

[ZB]

No, I would say Designer is not meant to serve orange juice but to design widgets.

Let us agree to disagree before this turns into a flame war. Though you have to agree, being served orange juice by the Qt Designer would not be bad... it sure gets hot in my appartement during the summers...

Thank you for answering my posts!

[wysota]

Let us agree to disagree before this turns into a flame war.

Oh, you haven't seen me start flame wars yet

Though you have to agree, being served orange juice by the Qt Designer would not be bad... it sure gets hot in my appartement during the summers...

That was a metafore, I hope... At least I treated it as one