Experts, what IDE are you using ?

**fullmetalcoder** · 1st June 2006, 09:42

I had the same problem under Fedora Core 5. As I didn't need Qt3 developpment tools I wen to /usr/bin directory, find them and appended a '3' to their name. Then I extended path variable in /etc/profile and everything worked fine : manual build of Qt4 projects, openning of designer files from konqui, ...
Life is so beautiful with a good linux distro!

**wysota** · 1st June 2006, 14:39

Originally Posted by fullmetalcoder

I had the same problem under Fedora Core 5. As I didn't need Qt3 developpment tools I wen to /usr/bin directory, find them and appended a '3' to their name. Then I extended path variable in /etc/profile and everything worked fine : manual build of Qt4 projects, openning of designer files from konqui, ...
Life is so beautiful with a good linux distro!

Wouldn't it be simpler just to extend your PATH variable so that Qt4 tools come earlier in the chain that Qt3 ones? In my case: export PATH=/usr/lib/qt4/bin:$PATH

**anli** · 12th July 2006, 06:51

It is interesting, still have not found successful strory about code QT4 completion with KDevelop. An adding QT4 src dir to PCS database doesn't help. But there is a very interesting thing. CC works for derived (own) classes and shows all inherited (i.e., QT4's) methods!! Probably a very little last trick is hidden somewhere here to force KDevelop to autocomplete QT4 classes :-) I use QT 4.1.4 and Kdevelop 3.3.3.

Has anybody some thoughts where this trick live?

Wysota, your messages tell me, you are an expert here (and there :-)). Will you?

BTW, after '-->' typing KDevelop's status string says via flash message, say, that this instance is a QPushButton (or something other QT approriate class).

**anli** · 14th July 2006, 01:20

Just want to inform, QT4 codecompletion *works* with kdevelop 3.3.91 (development version).

**aMan** · 14th July 2006, 14:03

is it stable?

**anli** · 14th July 2006, 17:29

Originally Posted by aMan

is it stable?

I can not judge from my newbie level. At any case, I have not any reason to downgrade yet.

**jrideout** · 14th July 2006, 21:19

Kdevelop 3.3.91 is mostly stable. But, about once a week I will bomb on be when using the new gdb interface. I've been told all the bugs I've reported have been fixed in trunk and will be out with the next kdevelep 3.4 beta. There are a few minor non crashing bugs that are more like quirks though. I use it because the qt4 integration is many times better.

**aMan** · 15th July 2006, 13:17

thanks for the answer..

but one more question:
in the feature plan there stands:

new class wizard
- bug fixes
- creation of headers only

is this optional, or does it realy never create the heads of the methods?

regards..
aman..

**jrideout** · 15th July 2006, 22:43

"create only header" is an option provided by a checkbox in the class creater wizard that only generates the header and not implementation stubs, so it only doest this if you want it to, either way it always creates the header.

**aMan** · 15th July 2006, 23:03

Originally Posted by jrideout

"create only header" is an option provided by a checkbox in the class creater wizard that only generates the header and not implementation stubs, so it only doest this if you want it to, either way it always creates the header.

thanks, sounds good..