C++ readonly property

[yyiu002]

Hi, I want to implement a read only property for a class, can anyone show me how to do this?

Currently I am using a function, is this the correct way? Can anyone explain what is this "const" means for function return? I just put there, it compiles, but have no clue what it will do? I guess it will stop user from changing the return value?
Class A
{
private:
QString myID;

public QString ID() const {return myID;}
}

[SixDegrees]

1) make the data you want to protect protected, or private.

2) create accessor functions that allow you to read the data, but not write it or change it in any way.

[yyiu002]

I just updated showed my code, is it the correct way?

[SixDegrees]

Yes, that will work.

[Zlatomir]

Yes, it will indeed work, but now you have a class A, with a empty QString as a member, and a function that allways returns an empty QString... this doesn't sound very usefull

So i guess you will need the constructor to initialize the QString member, or another method to create a usefull string in there.

[squidge]

const functions just means that the function will not modify any class variables.

[yyiu002]

const functions just means that the function will not modify any class variables.

What is the difference between following 2 lines?

Thanks.

public QString ID() const {return myID;}

public const QString ID() {return myID;}

[yyiu002]

I did this in my constructor: A::A(QString comPort, QString baudRate):myID(comPort+":"+baudRate)

But still a worry that myID might not be unique, I have create a list, each time adding an instance to check my ID whether is unique? Is there a better way to do this?

At C#, I might have a static constructor, generate my own ID each time when class get instantialized.

At C#:
Class A{

int myID;

static A(){
myID++;
}
}

How can I do similar thing in C++?

[Zlatomir]

public: QString ID() const {return myID;} // this is a function declared const fatjuicymole allready explained what this is

public: const QString ID() {return myID;} // this is a non-const function that returns a const QString

In c++ you can do something like:

class A{
    static int myID;
public:
    A(){
        myID++;
    }
    //...
};

class A{
    static int myID;
public:
    A(){
        myID++;
    }
    //...
};

To copy to clipboard, switch view to plain text mode 

and outside of class you will need to initialize the static variable, like this:

int A::myID = 0;

int A::myID = 0;

To copy to clipboard, switch view to plain text mode 

[yyiu002]

public: QString ID() const {return myID;} // this is a function declared const fatjuicymole allready explained what this is

public: const QString ID() {return myID;} // this is a non-const function that returns a const QString

In c++ you can do something like:

class A{
    static int myID;
public:
    A(){
        myID++;
    }
    //...
};

class A{
    static int myID;
public:
    A(){
        myID++;
    }
    //...
};

To copy to clipboard, switch view to plain text mode 

and outside of class you will need to initialize the static variable, like this:

int A::myID = 0;

int A::myID = 0;

To copy to clipboard, switch view to plain text mode 

Is this empty constructor gets called every time when I initialize it with a different constructor with parameters like following:

static int myID;
public:
A(QString myName){
}
//...
};

Thank you for your reply.

[Zlatomir]

No, only one constructor it's called (for each created object)

So you will need to increase that variable in each of them (and maybe you will want to define a copy constructor to increase the ID in case someone create a object by making a copy of one that already exist, because the default generated copy constructor won't increase that variable)

[yyiu002]

No, only one constructor it's called (for each created object)

So you will need to increase that variable in each of them (and maybe you will want to define a copy constructor to increase the ID in case someone create a object by making a copy of one that already exist, because the default generated copy constructor won't increase that variable)

Sorry I am little dummy on copy constructor? Please show me some code on how to do this.
Many thanks.

[yyiu002]

with line : int A::myID = 0;
When I put it inside header file where class A was defiined, I get error like: multiple definition of `A::myID', why is that? I am sure there are "#ifndef A_H
#define A_H " to stop class A was included more than once.

[hackerNovitiate]

with line : int A::myID = 0;
When I put it inside header file where class A was defiined, I get error like: multiple definition of `A::myID', why is that? I am sure there are "#ifndef A_H
#define A_H " to stop class A was included more than once.

The #ifndef makes sure that each .cpp file only includes one copy of the header. But if you have 5 .cpp files that have "#include a.h", then the header will be included in 5 files, so A::myID will be defined 5 times. To fix that, move "int A::myID = 0" from the header into one of your .cpp files (but put it outside a function, just like how you define a global variable).

Also, here is a comprehensive article that describes all the ways to use "const" in C++: http://duramecho.com/ComputerInforma...wCppConst.html

You only need a copy constructor if you want to make a copy of an existing object. If you do, have a look at http://171.64.64.250/class/cs193d/ha...nstructors.pdf

[Zlatomir]

with line : int A::myID = 0;
When I put it inside header file where class A was defiined, I get error like: multiple definition of `A::myID', why is that? I am sure there are "#ifndef A_H
#define A_H " to stop class A was included more than once.

You got to learn about c++ way of doing this things, so you create a header file (a.h) for the class definition (here you don't write the implementation of the functions, just the definition) and you write a second file (a.cpp) that include the a.h and here you write the implementation (it's not like in c#) and don't forget about the include guards (they are not useless)
Example:

//a.h file
#ifndef A_H
#define A_H
class A{
    static int myID;
    int member;
public:
    A();
    A(A&); //copy c-tor
    int id(); // function that returns the id
    // rest of the class definition
    //...
};
#endif // end of define A_H

//a.h file
#ifndef A_H
#define A_H
class A{
    static int myID;
    int member;
public:
    A();
    A(A&); //copy c-tor
    int id(); // function that returns the id
    // rest of the class definition
    //...
};
#endif // end of define A_H

To copy to clipboard, switch view to plain text mode 

and the cpp file:

//a.cpp
#include "a.h"
 
int A::myID = 0;
 
A::A(){
        myID++;
	}
 
A::A(A& ref){                //implementation of copy constructor
                                      // here you copy the members from the ref object passed to the constructor
        member = ref.member; //just an example here member is uninitialized... you need to take care of all the data members
 
	myID++; // and increment the static variable...
	}
int A::id() { 
        return myID;}

//a.cpp
#include "a.h"

int A::myID = 0;

A::A(){
        myID++;
	}

A::A(A& ref){                //implementation of copy constructor
                                      // here you copy the members from the ref object passed to the constructor
        member = ref.member; //just an example here member is uninitialized... you need to take care of all the data members
  
	myID++; // and increment the static variable...
	}
int A::id() { 
        return myID;}

To copy to clipboard, switch view to plain text mode 

[yyiu002]

At article http://www.codersource.net/c/c-misce...structors.aspx
it says following

There are 3 important places where a copy constructor is called.

1. When an object is created from another object of the same type
2. When an object is passed by value as a parameter to a function
3. When an object is returned from a function

case 2 and 3 could be a problem.

[Zlatomir]

case 2 and 3 could be a problem.

Why is case 2 and 3 problem?