Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: LGPL License is sufficient or not for the below scenario

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3
    Qt products
    Qt4
    Platforms
    Windows

    Default LGPL License is sufficient or not for the below scenario

    I want to use qt-sdk-win-opensource-2010.01.exe file from the path http://get.qt.nokia.com/qtsdk/ . This is to write a small application using the QT Libraries (to open up the native file dialog window using “QFILEDIALOG CLASS”) in windows. Is license required or is it a freeware?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    4,380
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 1,005 Times in 913 Posts
    Qt products
    Qt4
    Platforms
    Unix/X11 Windows Symbian S60
    Wiki edits
    5

    Default Re: LGPL License is sufficient or not for the below scenario

    Qt (note the writing!) is not freeware. You have to choose a license: commercial, GPL or LGPL.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3
    Qt products
    Qt4
    Platforms
    Windows

    Default Re: LGPL License is sufficient or not for the below scenario

    Thank you very much.

Similar Threads

  1. lgpl license and commercial software..
    By tgreaves in forum Newbie
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 7th January 2013, 13:52
  2. qmake project setup - qtestlib scenario
    By dsaiko in forum Qt Programming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 6th June 2011, 15:52
  3. Commercial license vs LGPL license
    By JovianGhost in forum Installation and Deployment
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 5th April 2010, 03:16
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21st May 2009, 22:26
  5. Is this true, Qt lgpl license..
    By tgreaves in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 8th March 2009, 11:34

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Digia, Qt and their respective logos are trademarks of Digia Plc in Finland and/or other countries worldwide.