plz teach inheritance

[wysota]

Qt is not a language. Qt is C++. Anything that goes in C++, goes in Qt. Thus you can't use the "super" keyword in Qt because there is no such keyword in C++. If you understand inheritance in C++, there is nothing else you need to learn about it to be able to use it with Qt.

[Santosh Reddy]

Anything that goes in C++, goes in Qt. Thus you can't use the "super" keyword in Qt because there is no such keyword in C++.

I agree that Anything that goes in C++, goes in Qt, but I don't completely agree with later statement

Thus you can't use the "super" keyword in Qt because there is no such keyword in C++

There are keywords (at-least I call them so) in Qt which C++ does not support like "signals", "slots" (who knows in future versions of Qt "super" may also is supported (may be with different meaning)).

Yes, I still agree with the overall meaning of the post, that there is no such keyword "super" in Qt (implied in C++)

[stampede]

There is nothing to agree or disagree here, the list of C++ keywords (reserved identifiers) is clearly defined: C++ keywords

[squidge]

Calling words like 'signals' keywords is incorrect IMO, they are just macros. Words like 'emit' are completely optional (they are syntactic sugar). Other words are only needed by moc and are removed by the C++ preprocessor.

[wysota]

There are keywords (at-least I call them so) in Qt which C++ does not support like "signals", "slots" (who knows in future versions of Qt "super" may also is supported (may be with different meaning)).

A "keyword" is something related to syntax of the language and interpreted by the compiler of that language. Since Qt is not a language, it can't introduce keywords for the C++ compiler. I can agree that things like "signals:" and "slots:" can be treated as keywords of moc.