Looks like I missed some comments...
No, it should have installed in both directories. As QMake doesn't seem to support installing into two dirs I had to hack the install script a little and didn't have time to test it properly, so it might have not worked.
True, I didn't think of that, although the library is meant to be compiled against release version of Qt as that's how Designer is compiled. So if you want a debug release of the widget library, you have to adjust the name yourself for now. I'll correct it later.There's no "d" suffix to discriminate between debug and release build as suggested in the help pages. (I tend to use bin/bind folders as a model for my app builds but this is supposed to act a standard Qt extension)
No, it certainly shouldn't happen. Maybe KDevelop changed the project file behind my back again.The "plugin" is being built with a staticlib setting in the pro file - I'm not sure if this is what you intended.
I was throwing the flames myself as I consider the bar stupid (waste of space, etc.), but if people need it, then it might be worth creating one.Still trying to get it working - I'm after one of those marvellous "Outlook 2003" navigation bars (and I saw some of the flame wars on the "other" Qt forum).
It should be very easy to change the appearance using CSS. If you have any comments about the functionality of the component, please don't hesitate to put them here. I have never used the Outlook bar myself, so I might be wrong about how it should work.However I've already sorted out the styling of QPushButtons - just trying to get the behaviours the same.
Thanks for the comments, I'm waiting for more.






Reply With Quote
Bookmarks